【注释】
[1]New edition with French translation by E.Renauld，Michel Psellos，Chronographie，2 vols，Paris 1926，1928.Cf.H.Grégoire’s emendations in B 2，550 ff.，and B 4，716 ff.J.Sykutris，BZ 27，99 ff.，and BZ 29，40 ff.English trans.by E.R.A.Sewter，London 1953.
[2]E.Kurt-F.Drexl，Michaelis Pselli scripta minora，Ⅰ-Ⅱ，Milan 1936，1941.Vol.Ⅰ contains a collection of speeches and occasional pieces，many of which were previously unknown;vol.Ⅱ gives 273 letters of Psellus of which all but sixty are published here for the first time.Cf.also F.Drexl，‘Nachtrage zur Ausgabe der Psellosbriefe von Kurtz-Drexl’，BZ 41（1941），309 f.；idem，‘Index nominum zu den von Sathas，Boissonade，Hase，Ruelle und Tafel edierten Psellosbriefen’，ibid.299 ff.；and J.Darrouzès，‘Notes d’épistolographie et d’histoire de textes’，REB 12（1954）176 ff.
[3]ed.P.de Lagarde，Gottingen 1882.Further references in J.M.Hussey，‘The Writings of John Mauropous：A Bibliographical Note’，BZ 44（1951），278 ff.On the significance of this scholar cf.idem，Church and Learning，39 ff.，52 ff.；‘The Canons of John Mauropous’，JRS 37（1947），70 ff.；‘The Byzantine Empire in the Eleventh Century’，Trans.Roy.Hist.Soc.32（1950），84 ff.
[4]French translation（to 1056），H.Grégoire，B 28（1958），325-62.
[5]Skabalanovic，Viz.gosudarstvo pp.ⅩⅢ and ⅩⅧ，shows the individual use which Scylitzes and Zonaras both made of their material for this period.On the relation of Zonaras to Psellus cf.the paper of O.Lampsides，，EEBS 19（1949），170 ff.
[6]edd.B.Wassiliewsky-V.Jernstedt，Cecaumeni strategicon et incerti scriptoris de officiis regiis libellus，St.Petersburg 1896.Part is edited with a Russian translation and very valuable commentary by V.Vasiljevskij，‘Sovety i rasskazy vizantijskogo bojarina Ⅺ v’。（The advice and admonitions of a Byzantine nobleman of the eleventh century），ZMNP 215（1881），242-99，216（1881），102-71，316-57.German translation with a good introduction，H.Beck，Vademecum des byzantinischen Aristokraten.Das sogenannte Strategikon des Kekaumenos，in Byzantinische Geschichtsschreiber Ⅴ，Graz.-Vienna-Cologne，1956.The assumption of G.Buckler，‘Authorship of the Strategikon of Cecaumenus’，BZ 36（1936），7 ff.，and‘Can Cecaumenus be the author of the Strategikon?’，B 13（1938），139 ff.，that the famous Byzantine general Cecaumenus was the author of both works has met with a certain amount of scepticism.Cf.N.Banescu，‘A propos de Kekaumenos’，B 13（1938），129 ff.（cf.also‘Autour de Kekaumenos’，REB 6（1948），191 ff.）；P.Orgels，‘Kekaumenos et la guerre pétchénègue’，ibid.402 ff.；M.Gyoni，‘L’oeuvre de Kékauménos，source de l’histoire roumaine’，Revue d’histoire comparée 23（1945），96-180.But H.G.Beck，op.cit.argues for the identification proposed by Buckler，as does Moravcsik，who at first was sceptical（Byzantinoturcica Ⅰ（1 st ed.）。，112，201 f.），but now agrees with her（Byzantinoturcica Ⅰ（2nd ed.）350 f.）.In his latest work P.Lemerle remains，however，sceptical：‘Prolégomènes à une edition critique et commentée des’Conseils et Récits’de Kekaumenos’Mémoires de l’Acad.Royale de Belgique LIV（1960），37 ff，and in my opinion he is right.J.Karayannopulos is also sceptical in an article in which he reflects in the main the view of previous studies：‘Zur Frage der Autorschaft am Strategikon des Kekaumenos，BZ 54（1961），257 ff.For the date of composition of the work，cf.Lemerle，op.cit.20.Cf.also G.G.Litavrin，Byl li Kekavmen，avtor’Strategikona’，feodalom?’（Was Cecaumenus，the author of the Strategicon，a feudal lord?），Vizantijskie ocerki，Moscow，1961，217 ff.
[7]Zepos，Jus Ⅳ，1-260.
[8]ed.N.Svoronos，Recherches sur le cadastre byzantin et la fiscalitéaux XIe et XIIe siècles：le cadastre de Thebes，Paris-Athens，1959.
[9]ed.Ⅴ.N.Benesevic，Zavescanie vizantijskogo bojarina Ⅺ v.（The will of a Byzantine nobleman of the eleventh century），ZMNP，N.S.9（1907），219 ff.English translation，S.Vryonis，‘The Will of a Provincial Magnate，Eustathius Boilas’，DOP 11（1957），263 ff.Abbreviated Russian translation by M.Levcenko，in Sbornik dokumentov po social’-no-ekonomiceskoj istorii Vizantii，Moscow，1961，169 ff.Textual emendations by R.M.Bartikjan，ⅤⅤ19（1961），26 ff.
[10]The most important publications for this and the succeeding centuries are：Miklosich-Müller：‘Actes de l’Athos’；Zachariae，Jus Ⅲ=Zepos，Jus Ⅰ；‘Akty Russkogo na sv.Afone monastyrja sv.velikomucenika Panteleimona’（Documents of the Russian monastery of the holy martyr Panteleimon on Mt.Athos），Kiev 1873;T.Florinskij，Afonskie akty，St.Petersburg 1880;Ph.Meyer，Haupturkunden zur Geschichte der Athoskloster，Leipzig 1894;W.Regel，，St.Petersburg 1898;M.Gudas，，EEBS 4（1927），211-48;Ch.Ktenas，，ibid.285-311;N.Bees，2（1911-12），1-100 Th.Ouspensky et Ⅴ.Bénéchévitch，Actes de Vazélon，Leningrad 1927;A.Solovjev-Ⅴ.Mosin，Grcke povelje srpskih vladara（Greek documents of the Serbian rulers），Belgrade 1936;Ⅴ.Mosin，‘Akti iz svetogorskih arhiva’（Documents from the archives of the Holy Mountain），Spomenik 91（1939）；Ⅴ.Mosin-A.Sovre.Supplementa ad acta graeca Chilandarii，Ljubljana 1948;G.Rouillard et P.Collomp，Actes de Lavra Ⅰ（897-1178），Paris 1937;P.Lemerle，Actes de Kutlumus，Paris 1945;F.Dolger，Aus den Schatzkammern des Heiligen Berges，Munich 1948;F.Dolger，Sechs byzantinische Praktika des 14.Jahrhunderts für das Athoskloster Iberon，Abh.d.Bayer.Akad.d.Wiss.，N.F.28，Munich 1949;A.Guillou，Les archives de Saint-Jean-Prodrome sur le mont Ménécée，Paris，1955.The publications of Rouillard-Collomp，Lemerle，and Dolger’s great collection，provide facsimiles of the documents and seals.
哦豁，小伙伴们如果觉得52书库不错，记得收藏网址 https://www.52shuku.net/ 或推荐给朋友哦~拜托啦 (>.<)
传送门：排行榜单 | 找书指南 |